Total Commodity Programs in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,004
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $229,794,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tim Duane Oleson | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $736,653 |
62 | Ward Thomas Harsin | Estherville, IA 51334 | $735,737 |
63 | Mark Richard Larsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $724,576 |
64 | Gordon Ray Juhl | Estherville, IA 51334 | $716,551 |
65 | David Paul Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $709,644 |
66 | Lowell Dean Christensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $707,882 |
67 | Mark Allen Gjerde | Estherville, IA 51334 | $702,056 |
68 | Bruce Zebedee | Estherville, IA 51334 | $697,703 |
69 | Simon & Sons Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $695,278 |
70 | Luke Farm Corporation | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $689,871 |
71 | Steven H Jensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $680,313 |
72 | James - James Miller Russell Mill | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $676,830 |
73 | Michael Alan Gage | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $672,400 |
74 | Olson Land & Livestock | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $672,383 |
75 | Soldier Creek Farm Inc | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $672,183 |
76 | Brian Howard Kesler | Estherville, IA 51334 | $671,401 |
77 | Eric Jon Gjerde | Estherville, IA 51334 | $668,675 |
78 | Wade Albert Lundgren | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $661,701 |
79 | L Steven Hanson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $661,069 |
80 | Loren Henry Meyer | Fenton, IA 50539 | $658,196 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”