Total Commodity Programs in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,004
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $229,794,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Huntley Brothers | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $656,265 |
82 | Kathy Mae Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $651,912 |
83 | Allen James Meyer | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $650,628 |
84 | Alan J Ross | Estherville, IA 51334 | $650,098 |
85 | Gary Lynn Smith | Estherville, IA 51334 | $649,673 |
86 | Marlyn G Hansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $644,148 |
87 | Neal John Ruschy | Estherville, IA 51334 | $639,549 |
88 | James Alvin Devore | Spirit Lake, IA 51360 | $622,276 |
89 | David Berge Boe | Estherville, IA 51334 | $621,014 |
90 | David Lee Young | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $619,543 |
91 | David Michael Pelzer | Estherville, IA 51334 | $618,142 |
92 | Jerome Robert Schacherer | Estherville, IA 51334 | $611,779 |
93 | David Charles Berven | Earlham, IA 50072 | $611,170 |
94 | Glen E Olson Rev Trust | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $599,217 |
95 | James Lloyd Madden | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $596,431 |
96 | Dan Dean Warren | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $591,588 |
97 | Douglas Schroeder | Estherville, IA 51334 | $589,306 |
98 | Laverne Richard Schnell | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $586,743 |
99 | Gregory Dean Anderson | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $584,796 |
100 | Keith Richard Rosburg | Estherville, IA 51334 | $575,348 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”