Counter Cyclical Program in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 817
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $9,155,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gary Lynn Smith | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,977 |
102 | Ward Thomas Harsin | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,947 |
103 | Laverne Richard Schnell | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $24,772 |
104 | Hillbrook Partners | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,727 |
105 | Richard H Rosburg | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,719 |
106 | Marlyn G Hansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,579 |
107 | Eugene Ormal Guinn | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $24,571 |
108 | Lisa Susan Guinn | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $24,571 |
109 | Mark W Guge | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,495 |
110 | Esther Kay Nelson | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $24,428 |
111 | Douglas E Nelson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,424 |
112 | Brian Howard Kesler | Estherville, IA 51334 | $24,298 |
113 | L J Farms Inc | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $24,096 |
114 | David Paul Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $23,930 |
115 | Madison Farm Enterprises Ltd | Estherville, IA 51334 | $23,689 |
116 | Hans Hansen Farm Corp | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $23,629 |
117 | William Grant Ellis | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $23,629 |
118 | Anna Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $23,603 |
119 | Ronald Allen Olson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $23,391 |
120 | Arvin Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $23,347 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”