Conservation Reserve Program in Emmet County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 327
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $2,168,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Patricia Lynn Bursell | Page, AZ 86040 | $4,953 |
122 | James Lloyd Madden | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $4,605 |
123 | Shane M Smith | Terril, IA 51364 | $4,600 |
124 | Roxanne Eileen Christensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $4,521 |
125 | Michael W Herke | Estherville, IA 51334 | $4,484 |
126 | , | $4,373 | |
127 | Laverne And Linda Jensen Rvoc Tr | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $4,354 |
128 | R S K D Farm LLC | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $4,210 |
129 | Tom Baron | Boca Raton, FL 33433 | $4,134 |
130 | John P Umscheid | Estherville, IA 51334 | $4,120 |
131 | Lloyd C Petersen | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $3,948 |
132 | Olson Land LLC | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $3,880 |
133 | Monty Miller Family Trust | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $3,817 |
134 | Clifford Clayton Consv | Estherville, IA 51334 | $3,813 |
135 | C & J Farm Partnership | Swea City, IA 50590 | $3,748 |
136 | Gerald Lee Ulrich | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $3,696 |
137 | Steven L Friesner Revocable Trust | Estherville, IA 51334 | $3,695 |
138 | Susan-susan L Friesner Revocable Trust Friesner | Estherville, IA 51334 | $3,695 |
139 | James R. Naibert Rev. Living Trust | Sisters, OR 97759 | $3,602 |
140 | Don Jenson Life Estate | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $3,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”