Loan Deficiency in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,062
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $26,976,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mark Richard Larsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $67,239 |
122 | Scott Cory Weisbrod | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $67,057 |
123 | Kenneth L Devore | Terril, IA 51364 | $66,921 |
124 | Donald Duane Gage | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $66,065 |
125 | Russell D Richard | Estherville, IA 51334 | $64,901 |
126 | Jeffrey Elmer Felkey | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $64,294 |
127 | Scott D Herum | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $64,206 |
128 | Darvin Leroy Schnell | Estherville, IA 51334 | $64,059 |
129 | Herb M Jacobsen | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $63,696 |
130 | Joe Warren Higgins | Estherville, IA 51334 | $63,485 |
131 | Bruce Allan Chrestiansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $63,178 |
132 | Gary James Meyer | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $63,110 |
133 | Stacy Lyn Zumbach | Estherville, IA 51334 | $62,871 |
134 | Dale Young Farms Corp | Estherville, IA 51334 | $62,622 |
135 | Dkh Inc | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $62,092 |
136 | Jon Scott Barrett | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $60,909 |
137 | Daryl Jon Madison | Estherville, IA 51334 | $58,786 |
138 | Gary Steven Madden | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $58,548 |
139 | Glenn Edwin Henriksen | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $58,487 |
140 | Virgil L Henrickson | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $58,202 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”