Loan Deficiency in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,062
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $26,976,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Kenneth Edward Reinhardt | Gruver, IA 51334 | $58,108 |
142 | Douglas Allyn Hansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $57,301 |
143 | Madison Farm Enterprises Ltd | Estherville, IA 51334 | $56,785 |
144 | Randy R Fessler | Fenton, IA 50539 | $56,041 |
145 | Harlan Henry Kinnander | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $55,438 |
146 | Jay D Ingvall | Estherville, IA 51334 | $55,379 |
147 | Dennis C Geesman | Fenton, IA 50539 | $54,897 |
148 | Douglas E Nelson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $54,872 |
149 | Paul R Smith | Estherville, IA 51334 | $54,604 |
150 | Okb Inc | Spencer, IA 51301 | $54,117 |
151 | Lauren Russell Devore | Terril, IA 51364 | $53,458 |
152 | Lance White | Estherville, IA 51334 | $52,987 |
153 | Anna Enerson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $52,902 |
154 | Delbert Dwayne Luke | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $52,612 |
155 | Wm W & Mary B Smith Partnership | Algona, IA 50511 | $52,335 |
156 | William Kenneth Reinhardt | Estherville, IA 51334 | $51,926 |
157 | David Joseph Rezac | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $51,319 |
158 | Linda Ann Christensen | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $51,131 |
159 | Glenn W Howard | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $50,544 |
160 | Glen Julius Hansen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $50,185 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”