Loan Deficiency in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 1,062
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $26,976,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Paul Duane Preston | Swea City, IA 50590 | $45,012 |
182 | Arnold E Oleson | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $45,002 |
183 | Gerald Edward Pluth | Estherville, IA 51334 | $44,932 |
184 | L J Farms Inc | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $44,485 |
185 | En Gage Farms LLC | Tucson, AZ 85704 | $44,387 |
186 | Homer Henriksen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $44,236 |
187 | Donald Dean Heerdt | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $44,159 |
188 | Joan D & K Barringer Rev. Living Trust | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $44,083 |
189 | Berven Farms Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $44,074 |
190 | Matt David Carney Sr | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $43,994 |
191 | Guse Family Farm Corporation | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $43,315 |
192 | Gerald Eugene Stillman | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $42,683 |
193 | Kim Alert Rasmussen | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $42,547 |
194 | Jeremy Jacob Bremer | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $42,283 |
195 | Michael Melvin Helmke | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $42,234 |
196 | Clausen Land & Cattle Co | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $42,225 |
197 | Grace - Soeth Revoca Soeth | Salisbury, NC 28144 | $42,104 |
198 | Lance Arlo Krumwiede | Estherville, IA 51334 | $41,796 |
199 | Loren Herman Kinnander | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $41,648 |
200 | Wilma J Hauck | Spirit Lake, IA 51360 | $41,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”