Farm Subsidy information
Emmet County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Emmet County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 768
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $17,610,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Matthew Ray Carney Jr | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $66,425 |
42 | Dennis Lloyd Nelsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $66,181 |
43 | Travis Lee Fredericksen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $65,954 |
44 | Arnold Goodman Twait | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $65,124 |
45 | Charles Raymond Gardner | Estherville, IA 51334 | $64,208 |
46 | Wright Farmz LLC | Estherville, IA 51334 | $63,448 |
47 | Mark Allen Gjerde | Estherville, IA 51334 | $63,307 |
48 | Neal John Ruschy | Estherville, IA 51334 | $63,193 |
49 | Eugene Ormal Guinn | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $62,198 |
50 | Mark Henry Revocable Trust | Arnolds Park, IA 51331 | $60,749 |
51 | Mark Leroy Preston | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $60,654 |
52 | Lisa Susan Guinn | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $60,535 |
53 | Tno Farms LLC | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $60,372 |
54 | Kathy Mae Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $59,788 |
55 | Delmer Lee Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $59,788 |
56 | Bruce Allan Chrestiansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $59,301 |
57 | Huntley Brothers | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $58,455 |
58 | Lance Arlo Krumwiede | Estherville, IA 51334 | $57,444 |
59 | Dennis G Gjerde | Estherville, IA 51334 | $55,352 |
60 | Paul R Smith | Estherville, IA 51334 | $54,605 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”