Total Commodity Programs in Emmet County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 484
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $4,639,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ann Louise Neppel | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $32,707 |
22 | Bruce Zebedee | Estherville, IA 51334 | $31,827 |
23 | James Alan Anderson | Estherville, IA 51334 | $31,441 |
24 | Arnold Goodman Twait | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $31,230 |
25 | Michael Lee Corderman | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $30,719 |
26 | Brenda L Corderman | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $30,719 |
27 | David Young Family Farms Inc | Wallingford, IA 51365 | $30,680 |
28 | Ryan Russell Miller | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $30,303 |
29 | Daniel Lee Nelsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $29,873 |
30 | Matthew Ray Carney Jr | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $29,713 |
31 | A D H Inc | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $29,215 |
32 | Dennis Lloyd Nelsen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $28,338 |
33 | Bruce Allan Chrestiansen | Estherville, IA 51334 | $28,033 |
34 | Paul Duane Preston | Swea City, IA 50590 | $27,782 |
35 | Ward Thomas Harsin | Estherville, IA 51334 | $27,591 |
36 | Kathy Mae Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $27,445 |
37 | Delmer Lee Hardecopf | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $27,445 |
38 | Soldier Creek Farm Inc | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $27,091 |
39 | S & A Love Ranch Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $27,005 |
40 | Jeffrey Elmer Felkey | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $25,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”