Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Fayette County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 94
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Fayette County, Iowa totaled $139,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Paul C Spies | West Union, IA 52175 | $23,745 |
2 | Russell C Guyer | Harmony, MN 55939 | $9,605 |
3 | Varykino Inc | Castalia, IA 52133 | $6,988 |
4 | Robert J Shaffer | Edgewood, IA 52042 | $6,035 |
5 | Paula Radke | Hudsonville, MI 49426 | $4,054 |
6 | Marlan Inc | Hudson, WI 54016 | $3,994 |
7 | Kenneth E Ney | Ossian, IA 52161 | $3,742 |
8 | Lois L Heick | Hawkeye, IA 52147 | $3,500 |
9 | S Jon Grimes | West Union, IA 52175 | $3,500 |
10 | Kathryn Hinsenbrock | West Union, IA 52175 | $3,470 |
11 | Martin-martin Kuennen&carolkuennenrevtru Kuennen | West Union, IA 52175 | $3,212 |
12 | Donald Ungerer | Hawkeye, IA 52147 | $3,176 |
13 | Brian K Meisgeier | Arlington, IA 50606 | $2,702 |
14 | Roger Croatt | Hawkeye, IA 52147 | $2,322 |
15 | Lagracia & Sons Inc | Clermont, IA 52135 | $2,237 |
16 | Kenneth W Iliff | Lancaster, CA 93539 | $2,167 |
17 | Howard Harkin | Arlington, IA 50606 | $2,050 |
18 | Thomas Dale Hayes - Thomas D Hayes Revocable Trust | Lamont, IA 50650 | $1,964 |
19 | Lucille M Pattison | Cedar Rapids, IA 52406 | $1,938 |
20 | Jeffrey Arthur Moellers | Arlington, IA 50606 | $1,627 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>