Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 215
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $5,166,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dvk Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $62,885 |
22 | Terry Lee Kruse | Rudd, IA 50471 | $61,563 |
23 | Desal Inc | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $60,782 |
24 | Mark W Chambers | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $60,452 |
25 | Mark Duane Forsyth | Charles City, IA 50616 | $58,151 |
26 | A J Marzen Inc | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $55,460 |
27 | Fox Family Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $55,274 |
28 | Schmidt Stock 'n Grain Inc | Osage, IA 50461 | $54,380 |
29 | Ronald Mcgregor Revocable Trust | Nashua, IA 50658 | $53,689 |
30 | Stricker Farms Ltd | Orchard, IA 50460 | $51,392 |
31 | Paul C Chambers | Charles City, IA 50616 | $50,740 |
32 | Dennis R Willert | Rockford, IA 50468 | $49,082 |
33 | Mark A Kuhn | Charles City, IA 50616 | $47,788 |
34 | Brian Alan Cole | Nashua, IA 50658 | $47,763 |
35 | Alvin Michael Marth | Rockford, IA 50468 | $45,845 |
36 | Dean Henry Holzer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $43,989 |
37 | David Russell Wenzel | Rudd, IA 50471 | $43,727 |
38 | David Richard Willert | Rockford, IA 50468 | $43,675 |
39 | Michael Glen Wyborny | Rudd, IA 50471 | $43,336 |
40 | Glen Robert Wyborny | Rudd, IA 50471 | $43,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”