Counter Cyclical Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,010
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $10,746,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joseph John Merfeld | Nashua, IA 50658 | $52,012 |
22 | Bruce Erwin Copper | Charles City, IA 50616 | $51,665 |
23 | Roger Eugene Stewart | Floyd, IA 50435 | $51,400 |
24 | Rick L Peters | Charles City, IA 50616 | $51,323 |
25 | Michael Glen Wyborny | Rudd, IA 50471 | $50,106 |
26 | Glen Robert Wyborny | Rudd, IA 50471 | $50,092 |
27 | Roni Alan Wyborny | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $50,092 |
28 | Norby Inc | Rudd, IA 50471 | $49,861 |
29 | Schmitt Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $49,632 |
30 | John Ryner Revocable Trust 12/27/2012 | Rudd, IA 50471 | $49,547 |
31 | Marth Bros | Rockford, IA 50468 | $49,101 |
32 | M & S Farm Ltd | Mason City, IA 50401 | $48,919 |
33 | Charles Edward Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $48,806 |
34 | Deanne Kay Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $48,806 |
35 | Wood & Sons Inc | Rudd, IA 50471 | $48,144 |
36 | Action Acres Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $48,126 |
37 | Frisbie Fms Ltd | Charles City, IA 50616 | $47,672 |
38 | Johnson Country Acres Ltd | Floyd, IA 50435 | $47,504 |
39 | Brad Alan Shanks | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $47,017 |
40 | Gordon Leroy Rohwedder | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $46,263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”