Conservation Reserve Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 910
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $5,214,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jesse W Gleason | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $25,775 |
42 | Schmitt Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $25,716 |
43 | The Borg LLC | Rochester, MN 55906 | $25,672 |
44 | Charles Pyatt Irrevocable Trust | Greene, IA 50636 | $25,576 |
45 | Frank K Kelly | Mason City, IA 50401 | $25,489 |
46 | Janice E Fullerton | Rockford, IA 50468 | $25,124 |
47 | Julie A Heddens | Charles City, IA 50616 | $24,740 |
48 | David W Underwood | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $24,518 |
49 | Douglas K Moser | Rockford, IA 50468 | $24,496 |
50 | Maurice M Johnson | Floyd, IA 50435 | $24,457 |
51 | Little Cedar Farms LLC | Pella, IA 50219 | $24,118 |
52 | Joan C Daiker | Charles City, IA 50616 | $23,998 |
53 | Bruce D Burroughs | Greene, IA 50636 | $23,694 |
54 | Mark W Chambers | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $23,077 |
55 | Anthony Alan Wood | Rudd, IA 50471 | $22,793 |
56 | Robert F Schmitt | Rockford, IA 50468 | $22,517 |
57 | Patricia Schmitt | Rockford, IA 50468 | $22,322 |
58 | Vorhes Ltd | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $22,317 |
59 | Paul G Regenold | Charles City, IA 50616 | $21,259 |
60 | Duane Francis Kay | Charles City, IA 50616 | $21,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”