Total Conservation Programs in Floyd County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 930
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $6,284,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert E Paulus | Rockford, IA 50468 | $31,233 |
42 | Raymond Lee Stonecypher | Floyd, IA 50435 | $31,105 |
43 | Douglas Kent Lindaman | Charles City, IA 50616 | $31,017 |
44 | Anna Marie Henely Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $30,907 |
45 | , | $30,894 | |
46 | Douglas K Moser | Rockford, IA 50468 | $30,675 |
47 | Nilewood Partnership Lllp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $30,577 |
48 | Joseph John Merfeld | Nashua, IA 50658 | $30,140 |
49 | Brandon R Mccabe | Charles City, IA 50616 | $29,950 |
50 | Gerald F Wright | Charles City, IA 50616 | $29,525 |
51 | A & J Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $29,424 |
52 | James Thomas Hughes | Charles City, IA 50616 | $29,371 |
53 | Melanie M Muth | Waukee, IA 50263 | $28,022 |
54 | Tammy Steinwandt | Waukee, IA 50263 | $28,022 |
55 | Jerald K Philipp | Osage, IA 50461 | $28,002 |
56 | Bradley James Holzer | Floyd, IA 50435 | $26,755 |
57 | Charles Pyatt Irrevocable Trust | Greene, IA 50636 | $26,668 |
58 | Randall Van Lines | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $26,639 |
59 | Jesse W Gleason | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $25,775 |
60 | Schmitt Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $25,716 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”