Production Flexibility Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,297
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $36,265,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steven R Mehmen | Nashua, IA 50658 | $116,498 |
62 | Ruzicka Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $116,412 |
63 | Henry Lester Rover | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $115,354 |
64 | Ronald Mcgregor Revocable Trust | Nashua, IA 50658 | $115,014 |
65 | Karmen Elva Mehmen | Plainfield, IA 50666 | $112,056 |
66 | Guy Emery Carpenter | Charles City, IA 50616 | $110,861 |
67 | Duane Michael Kingery | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $110,702 |
68 | Ott Grain Farms Ltd | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $109,185 |
69 | Pet Mar Inc | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $107,748 |
70 | Tjb Corporation | Charles City, IA 50616 | $107,742 |
71 | Dennis Dean Fulk | Rudd, IA 50471 | $107,507 |
72 | Boyd Alan Campbell | Rudd, IA 50471 | $107,133 |
73 | Debra Ann Campbell | Rudd, IA 50471 | $107,131 |
74 | Steven A Fischer | Rockford, IA 50468 | $104,616 |
75 | Robert J Fischer | Rockford, IA 50468 | $104,616 |
76 | Rick L Peters | Charles City, IA 50616 | $104,276 |
77 | Eldon Rademacher Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $104,017 |
78 | Dave Emil Schrader | Charles City, IA 50616 | $103,537 |
79 | Scott A Heinz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $102,479 |
80 | Roy W Bierschenk | Nashua, IA 50658 | $100,797 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”