Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 130
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $511,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Brittany Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $996 |
102 | Matthew Dean Ross | Charles City, IA 50616 | $988 |
103 | Bryan Douglas Hobbs | Rudd, IA 50471 | $988 |
104 | Bruce E And Colleen A Copper Revocable Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $966 |
105 | , | $954 | |
106 | James D Roll | Osage, IA 50461 | $928 |
107 | Jared W Koebrick | Charles City, IA 50616 | $922 |
108 | Jason Lee Bushbaum | Rudd, IA 50471 | $916 |
109 | Grant Cunningham | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $880 |
110 | Rodney L Hinz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $872 |
111 | Rodney Charles Katcher | Charles City, IA 50616 | $830 |
112 | Grand Horizon Farms LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $823 |
113 | Robbie M Schmitt | Rockford, IA 50468 | $775 |
114 | William J Ruzicka | Charles City, IA 50616 | $768 |
115 | Thomas Duane Sisson | Charles City, IA 50616 | $732 |
116 | James A Gambaiani | Charles City, IA 50616 | $684 |
117 | Paul C Chambers | Charles City, IA 50616 | $684 |
118 | Cody Baxter | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $664 |
119 | Albert P Schmitt | Charles City, IA 50616 | $592 |
120 | Tim David Paplow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”