Market Gains in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 515
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $13,565,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Schmitt Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $43,884 |
102 | Daniel Joseph Neal | Rudd, IA 50471 | $43,698 |
103 | Andrew M Frascht | Rockwell, IA 50469 | $42,720 |
104 | Richard Randall Schrader | Charles City, IA 50616 | $42,529 |
105 | Mark A Kuhn | Charles City, IA 50616 | $42,434 |
106 | Fred E Smith Fms Inc | Sun City West, AZ 85375 | $42,260 |
107 | Steven A Fischer | Rockford, IA 50468 | $41,924 |
108 | Emmett Nauman Jr | Floyd, IA 50435 | $41,684 |
109 | Robert J Fischer | Rockford, IA 50468 | $41,428 |
110 | Curtis Alan Marth | Rockford, IA 50468 | $41,350 |
111 | Roger Donald Koehler | Rudd, IA 50471 | $40,811 |
112 | Michael William Enabnit | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $40,130 |
113 | Randall L Stiles | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $39,619 |
114 | Allan Cerwinske Revocable Trust | Rockford, IA 50468 | $38,973 |
115 | Dennis John Staudt | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $38,920 |
116 | Stewart William Pyatt | Greene, IA 50636 | $38,471 |
117 | Teeple Farms Inc | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $38,435 |
118 | James Peter Nixt | Greene, IA 50636 | $37,559 |
119 | Ruzicka Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $37,364 |
120 | Lawrence Mark Staudt | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $37,339 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”