Deficiency Payment in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,013
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $4,471,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Kuhlemeier Truckline Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $10,775 |
122 | Mark A Kuhn | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,757 |
123 | Steven Neil Montag | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $10,750 |
124 | Eldon Rademacher Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,699 |
125 | Breezy Pines Ltd | Rudd, IA 50471 | $10,616 |
126 | Betty L Rex | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $10,511 |
127 | Richard E Ott I | Greene, IA 50636 | $10,362 |
128 | Hamand Gr & Lvstk Inc | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $10,274 |
129 | Eugene D Nieman | Nashua, IA 50658 | $10,117 |
130 | Charles Edward Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,107 |
131 | Duane Francis Ramker | Osage, IA 50461 | $10,083 |
132 | Ronald Lee Nauman | Floyd, IA 50435 | $10,053 |
133 | Leo B Staudt | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,041 |
134 | Schmidt Stock 'n Grain Inc | Osage, IA 50461 | $9,968 |
135 | C Jolene Steere | Greene, IA 50636 | $9,923 |
136 | Grandon Duane Burnett | Rudd, IA 50471 | $9,907 |
137 | Alan Jay Farmer | Orchard, IA 50460 | $9,890 |
138 | Max Edward Brandau | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $9,842 |
139 | Clyde M Shultz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $9,835 |
140 | Berdell Ahrens Revocable Trust | Rudd, IA 50471 | $9,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”