Total Commodity Programs in Floyd County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 615
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $5,689,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Gary Carstens Revocable Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $13,315 |
142 | David D Chambers | Osage, IA 50461 | $13,139 |
143 | Larry Dale Sonne | Charles City, IA 50616 | $13,120 |
144 | Michael John Staudt | Floyd, IA 50435 | $13,104 |
145 | Gary Robert Osterman | Charles City, IA 50616 | $13,034 |
146 | Duane Michael Kingery | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $12,925 |
147 | Daniel Lee Kingery | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $12,925 |
148 | Kenneth Kim Brandau | Rudd, IA 50471 | $12,790 |
149 | Lucas Adam Brandau | Rudd, IA 50471 | $12,790 |
150 | Brodie R Schweizer | Rockford, IA 50468 | $12,732 |
151 | Wayne Robert Koehler | Charles City, IA 50616 | $12,685 |
152 | Timothy James Mcmurchy | Floyd, IA 50435 | $12,616 |
153 | Leslie D Staudt | Rockford, IA 50468 | $12,596 |
154 | Pet Mar Inc | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $12,562 |
155 | Barry J Zimmer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $12,443 |
156 | Anthony Alan Wood | Rudd, IA 50471 | $12,356 |
157 | Rodney Charles Katcher | Charles City, IA 50616 | $12,193 |
158 | James Claire Muller | Rudd, IA 50471 | $12,026 |
159 | Duane Claire Jaeger | Charles City, IA 50616 | $11,942 |
160 | Rottinghaus Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $11,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”