Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 189
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $242,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Dora Mae Schrage | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $135 |
162 | Joseph William Paulus | Rockford, IA 50468 | $131 |
163 | Dale Tjaden | Floyd, IA 50435 | $126 |
164 | Mathew J Goddard | Nashua, IA 50658 | $90 |
165 | Tena P Alcini | Charles City, IA 50616 | $90 |
166 | Kurtis F Hoeft | Charles City, IA 50616 | $86 |
167 | Dana Dean Larson | Rudd, IA 50471 | $81 |
168 | Guy Clarence Lines Sr | Charles City, IA 50616 | $72 |
169 | Eugene Nickolas Brunner | Rockford, IA 50468 | $68 |
170 | Richard J Weiner | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $68 |
171 | Rebecca Kreger | Floyd, IA 50435 | $68 |
172 | Ryan Richard Schrader | Charles City, IA 50616 | $68 |
173 | Al Koenigsfeld | Charles City, IA 50616 | $59 |
174 | Kevin Lee Stewart | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $54 |
175 | Delton D Lane | Charles City, IA 50616 | $41 |
176 | Guy Emery Carpenter | Charles City, IA 50616 | $41 |
177 | Kyle Carpenter | Charles City, IA 50616 | $41 |
178 | Grant M Stewart | Charles City, IA 50616 | $41 |
179 | Donald R Helton | Charles City, IA 50616 | $32 |
180 | Jill E Henry | Charles City, IA 50616 | $32 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”