Emergency Conservation Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 177
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $1,140,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dennis Dean Brinkman | Greene, IA 50636 | $13,911 |
22 | Cleo Hebert Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $13,819 |
23 | James D Odowd | Greene, IA 50636 | $12,611 |
24 | Joseph Henry Eggena | Greene, IA 50636 | $12,529 |
25 | Hinz Farms LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $12,330 |
26 | Stewart Brothers Farms | Floyd, IA 50435 | $12,208 |
27 | Duane Russell Schwickerath | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $11,933 |
28 | James Boehmer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $11,578 |
29 | Philip Gene Parker | Rockford, IA 50468 | $11,557 |
30 | Richard Earl Ott II | Greene, IA 50636 | $11,456 |
31 | William Ernst | Mason City, IA 50401 | $11,436 |
32 | Rodney Charles Katcher | Charles City, IA 50616 | $11,372 |
33 | Ronald Lee Nauman | Floyd, IA 50435 | $11,306 |
34 | Charlie D Westervelt | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,965 |
35 | Drew C Staudt | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,643 |
36 | Dean Tjaden | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,563 |
37 | Gordon J Boge | Charles City, IA 50616 | $10,328 |
38 | Larry A Katcher | Charles City, IA 50616 | $9,971 |
39 | Carol M Chestek | Charles City, IA 50616 | $9,913 |
40 | Thomas L And Sheryl J Nixt Trust | Mason City, IA 50401 | $9,713 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”