Emergency Conservation Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 177
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $1,140,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Engels Farms Inc | Greene, IA 50636 | $47,456 |
2 | Florence Mary Beek | Mason City, IA 50401 | $42,409 |
3 | Charles B Franke | Charles City, IA 50616 | $40,219 |
4 | Adam Lee Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $35,589 |
5 | Frascht Diversified LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $32,368 |
6 | Robert E Engels | Rockford, IA 50468 | $29,510 |
7 | Tjaden Fms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $26,650 |
8 | Fox Family Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $23,460 |
9 | Debra Ann Barlow | Nashua, IA 50658 | $21,599 |
10 | Rottinghaus Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $20,604 |
11 | Larry Dale Sonne | Charles City, IA 50616 | $19,028 |
12 | David Marvin Knecht | Charles City, IA 50616 | $18,496 |
13 | Rick L Peters | Charles City, IA 50616 | $18,383 |
14 | William Joseph Ruzicka Jr | Charles City, IA 50616 | $15,976 |
15 | Rjf Farms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $15,792 |
16 | Saf Farms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $15,792 |
17 | Dustan Knecht | Charles City, IA 50616 | $15,068 |
18 | Dave Emil Schrader | Charles City, IA 50616 | $14,536 |
19 | Keith Westergard | Charles City, IA 50616 | $14,516 |
20 | John Charles Ruzicka | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $14,411 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>