Farm Subsidy information
Floyd County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,657
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $469,071,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jean M Staudt | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $1,060,424 |
42 | Rodney James Frascht | Charles City, IA 50616 | $1,053,531 |
43 | Boyd Alan Campbell | Rudd, IA 50471 | $1,048,920 |
44 | Dennis Andrew Carney | Mason City, IA 50401 | $1,031,653 |
45 | Donald D Fullerton | Rockford, IA 50468 | $1,023,523 |
46 | Curtis Alan Marth | Rockford, IA 50468 | $1,019,681 |
47 | M & J Farms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $1,014,391 |
48 | Desal Inc | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $1,009,094 |
49 | Scot Robert Havranek | Rockford, IA 50468 | $1,007,324 |
50 | Ott Farms Ltd | Rockford, IA 50468 | $1,003,153 |
51 | Ronald Dean Stewart | Charles City, IA 50616 | $985,685 |
52 | Greenzweig Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $985,227 |
53 | Terry Lee Kruse | Rudd, IA 50471 | $983,405 |
54 | Monte Neal Swanson | Ventura, IA 50482 | $980,047 |
55 | Fox Family Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $975,859 |
56 | Tjb Corporation | Charles City, IA 50616 | $975,499 |
57 | Rodney L Hinz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $962,884 |
58 | Bruce Erwin Copper | Charles City, IA 50616 | $957,550 |
59 | Tjaden Fms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $957,532 |
60 | James Claire Muller | Rudd, IA 50471 | $955,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”