Direct Payment Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,440
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $56,371,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger Eugene Stewart | Floyd, IA 50435 | $265,538 |
22 | Scot Robert Havranek | Rockford, IA 50468 | $265,512 |
23 | Ronald Lee Nauman | Floyd, IA 50435 | $257,668 |
24 | Ronald Dean Stewart | Charles City, IA 50616 | $255,040 |
25 | David Clarence Gersema | Nashua, IA 50658 | $253,037 |
26 | Gordon J Boge | Charles City, IA 50616 | $252,834 |
27 | Norby Inc | Rudd, IA 50471 | $252,371 |
28 | Marth Bros | Rockford, IA 50468 | $252,081 |
29 | Double Tt Farms Inc | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $249,260 |
30 | Roger W Burnett | Rockford, IA 50468 | $248,340 |
31 | Barry J Zimmer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $236,940 |
32 | Twin Brook Farms Ltd | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $235,119 |
33 | Frisbie Fms Ltd | Charles City, IA 50616 | $233,605 |
34 | Carl Henry Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $227,596 |
35 | M & J Farms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $226,961 |
36 | Fox Family Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $225,895 |
37 | Pet Mar Inc | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $223,844 |
38 | Rodney James Frascht | Charles City, IA 50616 | $223,332 |
39 | Larry Dale Sonne | Charles City, IA 50616 | $222,828 |
40 | Tjb Corporation | Charles City, IA 50616 | $221,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”