Loan Deficiency in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,157
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $36,207,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Ronald Lee Nauman | Floyd, IA 50435 | $200,652 |
| 22 | Larry Dean Bortz | Rudd, IA 50471 | $193,349 |
| 23 | Pet Mar Inc | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $190,035 |
| 24 | Barry J Zimmer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $181,706 |
| 25 | Ott Farms Ltd | Rockford, IA 50468 | $179,596 |
| 26 | Lyle & Leslie Staudt Ptnshp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $175,176 |
| 27 | Gordon Leroy Rohwedder | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $174,998 |
| 28 | David C Krumwiede | Charles City, IA 50616 | $172,491 |
| 29 | Guy Emery Carpenter | Charles City, IA 50616 | $171,537 |
| 30 | Double Tt Farms Inc | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $171,255 |
| 31 | A & J Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $168,216 |
| 32 | Scot Robert Havranek | Rockford, IA 50468 | $167,818 |
| 33 | Desal Inc | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $166,194 |
| 34 | M & J Farms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $162,281 |
| 35 | Bruce Erwin Copper | Charles City, IA 50616 | $162,080 |
| 36 | Duane Michael Kingery | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $161,657 |
| 37 | Stanley Arthur Mehmen | Plainfield, IA 50666 | $158,792 |
| 38 | Brian Alan Cole | Nashua, IA 50658 | $158,243 |
| 39 | Michael Glen Wyborny | Rudd, IA 50471 | $155,894 |
| 40 | Glen Robert Wyborny | Rudd, IA 50471 | $155,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf