Production Flexibility Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,297
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $36,265,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Alan Jay Farmer | Orchard, IA 50460 | $158,317 |
22 | Joseph John Merfeld | Nashua, IA 50658 | $158,163 |
23 | Ronald Lee Nauman | Floyd, IA 50435 | $156,188 |
24 | Roger Eugene Stewart | Floyd, IA 50435 | $155,661 |
25 | Schmitt Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $155,488 |
26 | Wood & Sons Inc | Rudd, IA 50471 | $152,580 |
27 | Action Acres Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $150,276 |
28 | Charles Edward Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $150,251 |
29 | Deanne Kay Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $150,251 |
30 | Ruzicka Farms Inc | Nashua, IA 50658 | $149,818 |
31 | Steven Lee Krumwiede | Charles City, IA 50616 | $147,863 |
32 | Staudt Bros | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $146,964 |
33 | Joe Cannon | Mason City, IA 50401 | $146,518 |
34 | Beek Farms Inc | Greene, IA 50636 | $146,167 |
35 | Gordon Leroy Rohwedder | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $145,933 |
36 | Gary Lee Ginther | Rockford, IA 50468 | $144,685 |
37 | Ronald James Litterer | Greene, IA 50636 | $141,002 |
38 | Dennis Dean Brinkman | Greene, IA 50636 | $139,276 |
39 | Fontanelle Hybrids | Charles City, IA 50616 | $135,401 |
40 | Michael Glen Wyborny | Rudd, IA 50471 | $135,156 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”