Farm Subsidy information
Greene County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Greene County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,100
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greene County, Iowa totaled $16,448,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S & A Partners LLC | Paton, IA 50217 | $145,769 |
| 2 | Holz Bros Inc | Grand Junction, IA 50107 | $144,711 |
| 3 | Eason Feedlots Lc | Scranton, IA 51462 | $106,030 |
| 4 | Jkb Farm Partnership | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $97,624 |
| 5 | Bld Farms Ltd | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $96,064 |
| 6 | Don Dunlop | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $95,529 |
| 7 | Youngblood Land & Livestock | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $80,815 |
| 8 | Dennis Dale Murphy | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $72,376 |
| 9 | Denton Wenger | Scranton, IA 51462 | $65,710 |
| 10 | Wessling Ag Inc | Grand Junction, IA 50107 | $63,633 |
| 11 | Gm Hunter Ag Inc | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $61,673 |
| 12 | David Skalla | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $61,599 |
| 13 | Hunter Greene Ag Inc | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $59,992 |
| 14 | Vanhorn Partnership | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $58,946 |
| 15 | Ned Raymond Johnston | Rippey, IA 50235 | $55,771 |
| 16 | Carl Edward Stukenholtz | Perry, IA 50220 | $55,039 |
| 17 | Bay Farms Inc | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $53,074 |
| 18 | Bruce Parker Banister- Bruce Banister Revocable Tr | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $49,383 |
| 19 | Towers Brothers Partnership | Adel, IA 50003 | $48,670 |
| 20 | Crouse Farm Inc | Dana, IA 50064 | $48,653 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf