Counter Cyclical Program in Grundy County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 923
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Grundy County, Iowa totaled $13,005,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kruger Farms Inc | Dike, IA 50624 | $130,000 |
2 | Hayes Farms Inc | Dike, IA 50624 | $124,516 |
3 | Gallentine Land Company | Conrad, IA 50621 | $108,078 |
4 | Kurtis Kruger | Parkersburg, IA 50665 | $94,967 |
5 | Bonnie Kruger | Parkersburg, IA 50665 | $92,938 |
6 | Stewart Farms | Dike, IA 50624 | $90,926 |
7 | Mark Allen Schildroth | Reinbeck, IA 50669 | $88,782 |
8 | Samo Farm Partnership | Holland, IA 50642 | $80,050 |
9 | Grain Farms Inc | Conrad, IA 50621 | $78,727 |
10 | Kitzman Farms Inc | Beaman, IA 50609 | $77,445 |
11 | O K Farms Inc | Dike, IA 50624 | $76,898 |
12 | Craig Allen Smith | Grundy Center, IA 50638 | $76,267 |
13 | Karl Strohbehn Farms Inc | Reinbeck, IA 50669 | $75,944 |
14 | Paul Edwin Peters | Wellsburg, IA 50680 | $74,392 |
15 | Richter Stock Farms Inc | Reinbeck, IA 50669 | $73,412 |
16 | Dallas Henry Koch | Wellsburg, IA 50680 | $71,837 |
17 | Gary Donald Richter-gary D Richter Revocable Trust | Reinbeck, IA 50669 | $71,742 |
18 | Schildroth Bros | Reinbeck, IA 50669 | $71,678 |
19 | Stormy's Acres Inc | Ames, IA 50010 | $69,631 |
20 | Michael Duane Meester | Parkersburg, IA 50665 | $69,157 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>