Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Hamilton County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 55
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $68,266 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Snb Farm Partnership | Webster City, IA 50595 | $1,239 |
22 | Randy Hetland | Story City, IA 50248 | $1,227 |
23 | Terry D Olson | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $1,118 |
24 | Sinold Swenson | Story City, IA 50248 | $1,110 |
25 | James W Richardson | Webster City, IA 50595 | $1,065 |
26 | Lynn Habben | Webster City, IA 50595 | $1,015 |
27 | James F Sylvester | Webster City, IA 50595 | $923 |
28 | Anthony Joe Woodall-anthony J Woodall Revocable Tr | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $884 |
29 | Leslie Warren Eggers | Webster City, IA 50595 | $840 |
30 | Worthington Farm Partnership | Webster City, IA 50595 | $747 |
31 | Clearview Cattle Co | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $720 |
32 | Mae N Koop | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $711 |
33 | Ronald Carlson | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $708 |
34 | Don D Williams | Williams, IA 50271 | $705 |
35 | Verlon Roy Klaver | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $636 |
36 | F Gaylord Jones Revocable Trust | Eagle Grove, IA 50533 | $621 |
37 | John G Ely | Webster City, IA 50595 | $602 |
38 | James Phillip Juon | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $566 |
39 | Mark Severson | Webster City, IA 50595 | $540 |
40 | Clinton Arends | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”