Farm Subsidy information
Hamilton County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Hamilton County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,004
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $18,114,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Revbco Inc | Stratford, IA 50249 | $58,432 |
22 | Mr Kreg Jon Kantak | Webster City, IA 50595 | $57,986 |
23 | Gail A Kantak | Webster City, IA 50595 | $57,986 |
24 | Claude Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $55,529 |
25 | Allen Anderson | Williams, IA 50271 | $54,831 |
26 | Ryan Richard Davison | Webster City, IA 50595 | $53,626 |
27 | Timothy John Mortenson | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $51,944 |
28 | Randy Merritt Olson | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $51,833 |
29 | Agri Ltd By Hoelscher | Williams, IA 50271 | $49,329 |
30 | Bradley Alan Carlson | Jewell, IA 50130 | $49,204 |
31 | Jeffrey A Anderson | Webster City, IA 50595 | $48,789 |
32 | J & A Pork Ltd | Stratford, IA 50249 | $48,495 |
33 | Tim Blomgren | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $48,085 |
34 | Mark Claude | Webster City, IA 50595 | $47,453 |
35 | Mjmwc Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $47,168 |
36 | Marion A Johnson | Story City, IA 50248 | $46,587 |
37 | Gordon Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $45,257 |
38 | Henderson Brothers Farms LLC | Story City, IA 50248 | $45,160 |
39 | Trent Joseph Mason | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $45,137 |
40 | Wbb Ltd Ptshp | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $44,965 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”