Conservation Reserve Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,673
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $61,286,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas Todd Krumm | Boone, IA 50036 | $280,361 |
22 | Max R Fonken | Williams, IA 50271 | $272,445 |
23 | Terry D Olson | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $272,436 |
24 | Roger D Anderson Acres Ltd | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $268,769 |
25 | Wbb Ltd Ptshp | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $266,828 |
26 | Duane A Carlson | Luther, IA 50152 | $265,305 |
27 | Claude Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $260,462 |
28 | Dannie Lee Sonksen | Stratford, IA 50249 | $259,382 |
29 | Agri Ltd By Hoelscher | Williams, IA 50271 | $258,758 |
30 | Duane Engelby | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $258,142 |
31 | Gerald D Johnson Rev Tr - Gerald D Johnson | Yankton, SD 57078 | $257,627 |
32 | Donald Eugene Rasmussen | Webster City, IA 50595 | $255,754 |
33 | Bruce B Bergeson | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $245,501 |
34 | Nancy J Holt | Stratford, IA 50249 | $239,291 |
35 | Estate Of John I Koop | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $233,929 |
36 | Ralph A Olsen Trust | Webster City, IA 50595 | $228,933 |
37 | Boone Forks Farm Inc | Stratford, IA 50249 | $226,931 |
38 | Mark Westrum | Stratford, IA 50249 | $225,087 |
39 | Carol Schlotfeldt | Webster City, IA 50595 | $222,673 |
40 | Nancy A Wehrheim | Solon, IA 52333 | $217,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”