Farm Subsidy information
Hamilton County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Hamilton County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 768
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $20,820,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bradley Alan Carlson | Jewell, IA 50130 | $54,964 |
42 | J & A Pork Ltd | Stratford, IA 50249 | $53,758 |
43 | Claude Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $49,316 |
44 | Larry E Oconnor | Webster City, IA 50595 | $49,016 |
45 | Lynn Knutson | Story City, IA 50248 | $48,804 |
46 | Bradley Allen Mickelson | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $48,242 |
47 | Ryan Lee Mickelson | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $48,240 |
48 | John J George Koop | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $44,255 |
49 | Paul Hill Revocable Trust | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $43,547 |
50 | Michael Mason | Webster City, IA 50595 | $43,025 |
51 | Steven L Voss | Woolstock, IA 50599 | $40,797 |
52 | Larry Dean Sharer | Jewell, IA 50130 | $40,636 |
53 | Hinrichsen Farm Partnership LLC | Ames, IA 50014 | $39,940 |
54 | Delbert Leslie Eggers | Webster City, IA 50595 | $39,938 |
55 | David Eugene Carlson | Jewell, IA 50130 | $39,712 |
56 | Dean A Gillette | Miles City, MT 59301 | $39,482 |
57 | Timberland Farms Ltd | Story City, IA 50248 | $39,377 |
58 | Richland Family Farms Inc | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $38,970 |
59 | Peterson Farmland LLC | Des Moines, IA 50310 | $38,084 |
60 | Bgm Farms Inc | New Providence, IA 50206 | $37,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”