Conservation Reserve Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 633
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $3,725,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tim Blomgren | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $20,900 |
42 | Janice K Cottington | Jewell, IA 50130 | $20,671 |
43 | Kent Wagner | Webster City, IA 50595 | $20,658 |
44 | Donald Eugene Rasmussen | Webster City, IA 50595 | $20,580 |
45 | Wbb Ltd Ptshp | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $20,525 |
46 | Estate Of John I Koop | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $20,362 |
47 | Duane Engelby | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $20,246 |
48 | Bette Rathke | Stratford, IA 50249 | $20,145 |
49 | Janet Lee Sigmund | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $20,007 |
50 | Claude Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $18,786 |
51 | Mark Claude | Webster City, IA 50595 | $18,717 |
52 | Douglas Van Langen | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $18,670 |
53 | Larry E Oconnor | Webster City, IA 50595 | $18,636 |
54 | Donald J Woodhouse | Webster City, IA 50595 | $18,629 |
55 | Shady Lane Farm LLC | Story City, IA 50248 | $18,490 |
56 | Tom Dinsdale | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $18,456 |
57 | Harlan Lundquist | Ames, IA 50014 | $18,333 |
58 | Donna Jansen | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $18,275 |
59 | Linda L Longnecker | Cambridge, IA 50046 | $17,905 |
60 | Gourley Grain Company Lc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $17,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”