Market Gains in Hamilton County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 525
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $10,744,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Raymond Danielson Rev Tr | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $62,968 |
42 | World Wide Pig LLC | Jewell, IA 50130 | $62,533 |
43 | Carroll D Ose | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $61,040 |
44 | Gordon Quam | Boone, IA 50036 | $59,526 |
45 | Agri Ltd By Hoelscher | Williams, IA 50271 | $57,762 |
46 | Mr Kreg Jon Kantak | Webster City, IA 50595 | $57,739 |
47 | Delbert Leslie Eggers | Webster City, IA 50595 | $57,055 |
48 | Paul Francis Wagner | Woolstock, IA 50599 | $55,396 |
49 | Arnold Lee Odland | Webster City, IA 50595 | $55,199 |
50 | Rodney Lee Hoversten | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $55,008 |
51 | Patsy L Brock | Webster City, IA 50595 | $54,358 |
52 | Allen Lee Trampel | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $53,772 |
53 | Rodney Alan Patterson | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $52,340 |
54 | Jason Brown Mccoskey | Jewell, IA 50130 | $51,823 |
55 | Jeff-j&m Hill Family Hill | Jewell, IA 50130 | $51,801 |
56 | Matthew Dean Carlson | Stratford, IA 50249 | $51,378 |
57 | Hill Bros Fm | Webster City, IA 50595 | $50,426 |
58 | B & H Turkey Farms | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $48,592 |
59 | Steven Ellis Butler | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $48,361 |
60 | David Laverne Kantak | Webster City, IA 50595 | $47,311 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”