Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Hamilton County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 570
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $5,603,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Travis Lee Sonksen | Stratford, IA 50249 | $14,107 |
142 | Brian Wesley Wilcox | Stratford, IA 50249 | $14,092 |
143 | James D Hill | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $14,032 |
144 | Keith Allen Hauge | Jewell, IA 50130 | $13,870 |
145 | Raaj Hill Partnership | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $13,838 |
146 | Keith Gene Holdgrafer | Webster City, IA 50595 | $13,764 |
147 | John M Wibholm | Williams, IA 50271 | $13,572 |
148 | Larson Turkey Farms Inc | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $13,557 |
149 | Shane Michael Sonksen | Boone, IA 50036 | $13,533 |
150 | Ago Farms LLC | Jewell, IA 50130 | $13,209 |
151 | Bruce Alan Mark | Williams, IA 50271 | $13,009 |
152 | Richard Mason | Webster City, IA 50595 | $12,967 |
153 | Sterling Peterson | Jewell, IA 50130 | $12,892 |
154 | Loran Seiser | Webster City, IA 50595 | $12,882 |
155 | Paul E Sealine | Stratford, IA 50249 | $12,833 |
156 | Hinrichsen Farm Partnership LLC | Ames, IA 50014 | $12,766 |
157 | Adam John Richardson | Webster City, IA 50595 | $12,765 |
158 | Arlon Greg Samuelson | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $12,669 |
159 | Mark Bockwoldt | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $12,608 |
160 | Jerry Klaver | Kamrar, IA 50132 | $12,588 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”