Conservation Reserve Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 587
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $3,850,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Victor Weisberg | Webster City, IA 50595 | $8,526 |
142 | Ima - Ima Lee & Laverne Erickson Rev Tr | Boone, IA 50036 | $8,522 |
143 | Don Wemhoff | Columbia, MO 65202 | $8,434 |
144 | Donna Wemhoff | Columbia, MO 65202 | $8,434 |
145 | Larry-brim Trust | Webster City, IA 50595 | $8,371 |
146 | Travis J Risetter | Jewell, IA 50130 | $8,355 |
147 | Teddy Anderson | Webster City, IA 50595 | $8,331 |
148 | Bill A Chally | Stratford, IA 50249 | $8,317 |
149 | Dean Ward Carden | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $8,210 |
150 | Sansgaard Group Inc | Story City, IA 50248 | $8,189 |
151 | Kathryn Jones Mosher Nonexempt Trust | Webster City, IA 50595 | $8,130 |
152 | Karen K Nelson | Stratford, IA 50249 | $8,100 |
153 | Patrick Charles Patterson | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $8,070 |
154 | Eric Doolittle | Williams, IA 50271 | $8,069 |
155 | Brad Dinsdale | Webster City, IA 50595 | $7,995 |
156 | , | $7,920 | |
157 | Gerald T Maples | Webster City, IA 50595 | $7,843 |
158 | Jason Springer Tr | Cape Coral, FL 33904 | $7,767 |
159 | Raaj Hill Partnership | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $7,666 |
160 | Kantak Family Irrevocable Trust | Webster City, IA 50595 | $7,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”