Counter Cyclical Program in Hardin County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,034
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Hardin County, Iowa totaled $13,715,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael Willard Mccartney | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $64,052 |
22 | Kix Inc | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $63,433 |
23 | John David Lawless | Ankeny, IA 50021 | $62,290 |
24 | Mark Irwin Seward | New Providence, IA 50206 | $61,832 |
25 | Homeview Farms LLC | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $61,784 |
26 | David D Petty | Eldora, IA 50627 | $61,429 |
27 | Robert Frank Cook | New Providence, IA 50206 | $60,637 |
28 | Mark Alan Schwarck | Eldora, IA 50627 | $58,351 |
29 | Hillcrest Stock Farms Inc | Iowa Falls, IA 50126 | $58,316 |
30 | Ridge View Stock Farms Corp | Iowa Falls, IA 50126 | $58,316 |
31 | Jeske Farms Inc | Eldora, IA 50627 | $58,144 |
32 | Coburn Bros Ltd | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $57,918 |
33 | James Emil Vierkandt | Alden, IA 50006 | $57,678 |
34 | Bahr Brothers | Iowa Falls, IA 50126 | $55,862 |
35 | Hake Farms Inc | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $55,438 |
36 | Rex S Lawler | New Providence, IA 50206 | $54,991 |
37 | Hub Farms LLC | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $53,651 |
38 | Stephen Douglas Renaud | Iowa Falls, IA 50126 | $52,745 |
39 | Dennis J Prochaska | Iowa Falls, IA 50126 | $52,362 |
40 | Double B Farms Inc | Eldora, IA 50627 | $51,968 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”