Farm Subsidy information
Hardin County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Hardin County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 800
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hardin County, Iowa totaled $22,250,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steven Ellwood | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $53,610 |
62 | Jeffrey Cook | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $53,088 |
63 | Hej Farms LLC | State Center, IA 50247 | $52,809 |
64 | Gregg Eldon Reisinger | Eldora, IA 50627 | $52,674 |
65 | Jeske Farms Inc | Eldora, IA 50627 | $52,207 |
66 | Lavonne S Topp Revocable Trust | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $51,474 |
67 | Benson Egg Ltd | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $51,471 |
68 | Matthew Benjamin Topp | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $51,159 |
69 | Sara Rachel Martin | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $50,880 |
70 | Allen Paul Kadolph | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $50,724 |
71 | Brent Todd Friest | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $50,056 |
72 | Curt Ferris Farms LLC | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $48,356 |
73 | Rick & Sue Mcdowell Family Trust | Iowa Falls, IA 50126 | $46,534 |
74 | Bolen Properties LLC | Nevada, IA 50201 | $46,452 |
75 | La Mar Farms Ltd | Radcliffe, IA 50230 | $45,934 |
76 | Travis Douglas Engelson | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $45,717 |
77 | Leslie Allan Clampitt | New Providence, IA 50206 | $44,446 |
78 | Jason David Martin | Hubbard, IA 50122 | $44,244 |
79 | Jerry Dean Rash | Union, IA 50258 | $43,911 |
80 | Dan Cook | New Providence, IA 50206 | $43,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”