Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Harrison County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 124
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Harrison County, Iowa totaled $728,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald Vana | Logan, IA 51546 | $9,693 |
22 | Robert Eugene Willard | Logan, IA 51546 | $9,199 |
23 | Kent Stewart Kersten | Logan, IA 51546 | $8,593 |
24 | David Arthur Chase | Logan, IA 51546 | $8,372 |
25 | Richard Gerhard Bruck | Persia, IA 51563 | $7,950 |
26 | Galen Alfred Mikels | Woodbine, IA 51579 | $7,874 |
27 | Helen M Jacobsen | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $7,750 |
28 | Terry L Moores | Woodbine, IA 51579 | $7,622 |
29 | Lawrence Faylor | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $7,291 |
30 | Larry Duane Pape | Woodbine, IA 51579 | $7,254 |
31 | Duane J Weber | Logan, IA 51546 | $6,952 |
32 | Randall Edward Miller | Panama, IA 51562 | $6,875 |
33 | Keith Edward Culver | Dunlap, IA 51529 | $6,864 |
34 | Lowrey Heritage Corporation | Springfield, VA 22153 | $6,805 |
35 | Michael Phillip Greenwood | Logan, IA 51546 | $6,765 |
36 | Donald Barnhart | Omaha, NE 68154 | $6,760 |
37 | Anthony L Smith | Woodbine, IA 51579 | $6,740 |
38 | Dennis Burmeister | Woodbine, IA 51579 | $6,563 |
39 | Charles R Mcclendon | Omaha, NE 68147 | $6,250 |
40 | David Geise | Omaha, NE 68164 | $6,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”