Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Henry County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 390
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $3,218,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gabeline Family Farms | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $231,516 |
2 | Larry D Anderson | Brighton, IA 52540 | $77,390 |
3 | Lehman Family Farms Inc. | New London, IA 52645 | $69,445 |
4 | Jason J Denning | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $63,807 |
5 | Leon Paul Peterson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $50,048 |
6 | Daniel Joseph Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $46,542 |
7 | Mallams Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $45,368 |
8 | Cml Farms Corp | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $44,562 |
9 | Remco Farm Partnership | Mt Union, IA 52644 | $44,023 |
10 | Spenser T Atwood | Brighton, IA 52540 | $41,880 |
11 | Francy Farms LLC | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $41,120 |
12 | Joseph Lee Remick | Hillsboro, IA 52630 | $39,399 |
13 | Thomas Keith Denning | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $39,089 |
14 | Larry Dean Remick | Hillsboro, IA 52630 | $38,447 |
15 | Davis Brothers Farms Corp | Winfield, IA 52659 | $37,533 |
16 | Mac Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $36,598 |
17 | Charles Dean Allen | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $36,522 |
18 | Fitz Farms Ltd | New London, IA 52645 | $34,420 |
19 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $34,222 |
20 | Dennis E Anderson | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $31,104 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>