Total Commodity Programs in Henry County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 464
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $3,755,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gabeline Family Farms | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $238,348 |
2 | Jason J Denning | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $127,183 |
3 | Larry D Anderson | Brighton, IA 52540 | $86,228 |
4 | Daniel Joseph Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $74,452 |
5 | Lehman Family Farms Inc. | New London, IA 52645 | $69,481 |
6 | Larry Joe Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $53,835 |
7 | Mns Family Farms LLC | Salem, IA 52649 | $53,496 |
8 | Thomas Keith Denning | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $52,980 |
9 | Leon Paul Peterson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $50,060 |
10 | Cml Farms Corp | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $47,218 |
11 | Mallams Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $45,368 |
12 | Joseph Lee Remick | Hillsboro, IA 52630 | $45,343 |
13 | Spenser T Atwood | Brighton, IA 52540 | $44,885 |
14 | Larry Dean Remick | Hillsboro, IA 52630 | $44,391 |
15 | Remco Farm Partnership | Mt Union, IA 52644 | $44,023 |
16 | Francy Farms LLC | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $41,120 |
17 | Davis Brothers Farms Corp | Winfield, IA 52659 | $40,490 |
18 | Charles Dean Allen | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $37,216 |
19 | Mac Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $36,598 |
20 | Fitz Farms Ltd | New London, IA 52645 | $34,422 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>