Counter Cyclical Program in Henry County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 947
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $7,557,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stanley Unkrich | Winfield, IA 52659 | $34,061 |
42 | Canaandale Farms Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $33,206 |
43 | Daniel Joseph Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $32,661 |
44 | Duayne A Hultquist | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $32,242 |
45 | Brooks & Brooks Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $31,252 |
46 | Mcgohan Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $30,622 |
47 | Larry K Meyer | Wayland, IA 52654 | $30,400 |
48 | Poultry King Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $30,086 |
49 | Grimmer Corp | Winfield, IA 52659 | $29,622 |
50 | Edward Davidson Grimmer | Winfield, IA 52659 | $29,570 |
51 | Thomas L Darbyshire | Morning Sun, IA 52640 | $29,498 |
52 | Jerry A Lindeen | Swedesburg, IA 52652 | $29,078 |
53 | James Douglas Carlson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $29,072 |
54 | Darrell Henry Moeller | Salem, IA 52649 | $28,694 |
55 | Ryan K Meyer | Wayland, IA 52654 | $28,508 |
56 | Ronald E Miller | New London, IA 52645 | $28,477 |
57 | Stephen L Settles | Winfield, IA 52659 | $27,567 |
58 | James John Vantiger | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $27,179 |
59 | Marc Erwin Benson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $26,830 |
60 | Allen Glen Rodgers | Winfield, IA 52659 | $26,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”