Farm Subsidy information
Henry County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Henry County, Iowa, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,168
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $19,114,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary Warren Burns | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $100,797 |
22 | Charles Dean Allen | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $100,230 |
23 | Fitz Farms Ltd | New London, IA 52645 | $88,586 |
24 | Kenneth Denning | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $86,015 |
25 | Martha R Mabeus | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $85,413 |
26 | Jerry Mabeus | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $85,412 |
27 | Allan Douglas Woline | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $84,462 |
28 | Dennis E Anderson | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $81,913 |
29 | Adam Gabeline | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $80,411 |
30 | Zachery Gabeline | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $80,411 |
31 | Mg Operations Inc | Salem, IA 52649 | $77,545 |
32 | Thomas Keith Denning | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $77,130 |
33 | A W Miller Inc | Salem, IA 52649 | $76,897 |
34 | Grimmer Corp | Winfield, IA 52659 | $76,689 |
35 | Achen Farms Inc | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $74,885 |
36 | W P Crawford Corp | Winfield, IA 52659 | $71,345 |
37 | Eric Alan Totemeier | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $71,323 |
38 | Jess E Settles | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $69,553 |
39 | Allen Glen Rodgers | Winfield, IA 52659 | $68,689 |
40 | Stanley Unkrich | Winfield, IA 52659 | $66,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”