Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Howard County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 143
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $4,011,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dale Gerard Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $6,055 |
102 | Darrin Grant Ludwig | Elma, IA 50628 | $5,482 |
103 | Danny W Gronwoldt | Riceville, IA 50466 | $5,398 |
104 | Scott Robert Fett | Elma, IA 50628 | $5,388 |
105 | Kimberly Alicia Fett | Elma, IA 50628 | $5,388 |
106 | Richard A Harding | Grimes, IA 50111 | $5,158 |
107 | T & T Partnership | Mason City, IA 50401 | $5,123 |
108 | Pietan Home Farm Inc | Elma, IA 50628 | $4,985 |
109 | Duane Dale Bodermann | Elma, IA 50628 | $4,632 |
110 | Scott Gerald Kach | Cresco, IA 52136 | $4,534 |
111 | Nathan Allan Widell | Cresco, IA 52136 | $4,463 |
112 | Jeffrey E Peckham | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $4,417 |
113 | Dean Donald Hubka | Cresco, IA 52136 | $4,170 |
114 | Laura Jean Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $4,153 |
115 | Bartelt Farms L C | Cedar Falls, IA 50613 | $3,362 |
116 | Lyle Dennis Halverson | Cresco, IA 52136 | $3,306 |
117 | James A Hemann | Chester, IA 52134 | $3,236 |
118 | Cathy H Miller | Indianola, IA 50125 | $2,902 |
119 | Warrington Family Trust | Mason City, IA 50402 | $2,552 |
120 | Howard County Experimental Farm | Cresco, IA 52136 | $2,548 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”