Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Howard County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 705
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $12,787,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Ronald Edward Balk | Cresco, IA 52136 | $27,547 |
142 | Bina Farms LLC | Waucoma, IA 52171 | $27,139 |
143 | Mark Allen Ries | Elma, IA 50628 | $26,956 |
144 | Dennis C Kruse | Cresco, IA 52136 | $26,835 |
145 | Daniel Ryan Balk | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $26,523 |
146 | Larry Dean Friedrich | Elma, IA 50628 | $26,348 |
147 | Brian Kyle Eastman | Riceville, IA 50466 | $26,066 |
148 | Donald Leroy Leff | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $25,770 |
149 | Michael Walter Mahr | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $25,761 |
150 | Leonard John Fravel | Cresco, IA 52136 | $25,761 |
151 | Devries Farms LLC | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $25,729 |
152 | Ktdr Farms LLC | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $25,418 |
153 | Arnold Martin Zimmerman | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $25,393 |
154 | George Henry Schmitt | Cresco, IA 52136 | $25,279 |
155 | Dennis Alan Vobr | Cresco, IA 52136 | $25,208 |
156 | Mark Alan Reicks | Cresco, IA 52136 | $25,157 |
157 | Myron George Myers | Riceville, IA 50466 | $25,027 |
158 | Daniel Charles Shatek | Elma, IA 50628 | $24,930 |
159 | Dean G Runde | Riceville, IA 50466 | $24,923 |
160 | South Fort Inc | Fort Atkinson, IA 52144 | $24,908 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”