Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Howard County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 493
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $3,286,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pinicon Farm | Mc Intire, IA 50455 | $194,818 |
| 2 | Saratoga Partnership | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $167,763 |
| 3 | Ludwig Farms | Elma, IA 50628 | $49,407 |
| 4 | D R S G Partnership | Cresco, IA 52136 | $47,121 |
| 5 | Watt Five LLC | Cresco, IA 52136 | $37,978 |
| 6 | Gregory Mark Mahr | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $34,055 |
| 7 | Thomas Francis Shatek | Elma, IA 50628 | $33,575 |
| 8 | Jason Dennis Rice | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $33,300 |
| 9 | Fett Farms Inc | Elma, IA 50628 | $31,094 |
| 10 | Sovereigns Inc | Cresco, IA 52136 | $30,241 |
| 11 | T & V Grover Farms Incorporated | Cresco, IA 52136 | $29,354 |
| 12 | James Koenigs | Mc Intire, IA 50455 | $28,822 |
| 13 | Eric Joseph Hawbaker | Riceville, IA 50466 | $28,421 |
| 14 | Michael Dale Lewis | Chester, IA 52134 | $26,029 |
| 15 | Kenneth Charles Moellers | Cresco, IA 52136 | $26,009 |
| 16 | Debra Rae Moellers | Cresco, IA 52136 | $26,009 |
| 17 | Schatz Dairy Farms LLC | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $25,485 |
| 18 | Grover Farms Inc | Hudson, IA 50643 | $25,229 |
| 19 | Pine Creek Farm Ltd | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $22,799 |
| 20 | Jade Jarome Shedenhelm | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $22,798 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf