Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Ida County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 425
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Ida County, Iowa totaled $11,742,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bower Corporation | Danbury, IA 51019 | $103,253 |
22 | Paul E Kistenmacher | Galva, IA 51020 | $89,031 |
23 | Rgc Inc | Danbury, IA 51019 | $88,734 |
24 | Darron Robert Uhl | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $87,132 |
25 | Diamond 28 Limited Partnership | Galva, IA 51020 | $86,879 |
26 | Drew Kistenmacher Inc | Galva, IA 51020 | $84,881 |
27 | Don C Friedrichsen | Holstein, IA 51025 | $84,352 |
28 | Linda S Friedrichsen | Holstein, IA 51025 | $84,044 |
29 | Robert Jay Uhl | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $83,677 |
30 | Lance Lee Luscombe | Holstein, IA 51025 | $83,019 |
31 | Dennis Charles Sykes | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $81,124 |
32 | Roger L Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $74,936 |
33 | Phyllis E Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $74,936 |
34 | H & J Farms Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $74,539 |
35 | Joshua Arthur Alvin Albers | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $68,415 |
36 | Troy Donavon Hare | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $66,677 |
37 | Ruser & Cipperley | Holstein, IA 51025 | $63,154 |
38 | Mason James Fleenor | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $62,148 |
39 | Brian W Riessen | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $61,707 |
40 | Btk Farms Inc | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $60,659 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”