Farm Subsidy information
Ida County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Ida County, Iowa, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 500
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ida County, Iowa totaled $15,882,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Douglas Sean Andresen | Alton, IA 51003 | $31,535 |
82 | Lance Lee Luscombe | Holstein, IA 51025 | $31,515 |
83 | Lane Ladean Luscombe | Holstein, IA 51025 | $30,637 |
84 | Matt Todd Farms Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $30,581 |
85 | S & B Radke Hogs LLC | Aurelia, IA 51005 | $30,564 |
86 | Brian Keith Wolterman | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $29,914 |
87 | Scott Lindgren | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $29,491 |
88 | Brian L Rohlk | Holstein, IA 51025 | $29,211 |
89 | Jack Randall Ausborn | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $29,160 |
90 | Twin Creeks Prairie Farm LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85018 | $29,130 |
91 | Maple View Farms Ltd | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $28,780 |
92 | Brad Lee Christiansen | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $28,576 |
93 | Patrick Leslie Mohr | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $28,270 |
94 | Nathan J Horstman | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $28,217 |
95 | D & S Farms Inc | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $28,216 |
96 | B2 Land & Livestock LLC | Holstein, IA 51025 | $27,932 |
97 | Gordon W Goodenow | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $27,392 |
98 | Kj Farms | Galva, IA 51020 | $27,245 |
99 | Ridge View Pork Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $26,676 |
100 | Dennis R Bennett | Galva, IA 51020 | $26,325 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”