Farm Subsidy information
Ida County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Ida County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,394
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ida County, Iowa totaled $373,650,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Merle D Dausel | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $699,362 |
102 | Sand Corporation | Clive, IA 50325 | $693,945 |
103 | 480 Land & Cattle LLC | Holstein, IA 51025 | $688,486 |
104 | Ojo Double K Partnership | Holstein, IA 51025 | $686,394 |
105 | Alan K Siebrecht | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $686,022 |
106 | Deanna Roeder | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $683,793 |
107 | Curtis And Nancy Rupert Revocable Trust | Holstein, IA 51025 | $680,160 |
108 | D B Farm Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $678,341 |
109 | Marc L Uhl | Danbury, IA 51019 | $671,596 |
110 | Roger Allen Bumann | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $669,569 |
111 | Amanda Kay Groth | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $641,554 |
112 | Grover T Senhen | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $640,415 |
113 | Jason Wiebers | Schleswig, IA 51461 | $635,097 |
114 | Mark Alan Forbes | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $629,210 |
115 | Darrin J Roeder | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $627,495 |
116 | Dauland Express Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $624,530 |
117 | G & D Farms Ltd | Schaller, IA 51053 | $622,891 |
118 | Deron Edward Schmidt | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $618,947 |
119 | Steven A Schug Revocable Tr | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $616,327 |
120 | Patrick Leslie Mohr | Galva, IA 51020 | $604,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”