Conservation Reserve Program in Ida County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 254
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ida County, Iowa totaled $2,257,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael P Bergman | Arthur, IA 51431 | $33,807 |
22 | United Bank Of Iowa | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $31,487 |
23 | Scott Lindgren | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $29,367 |
24 | Twin Creeks Prairie Farm LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85018 | $29,130 |
25 | Dennis R Bennett | Galva, IA 51020 | $26,325 |
26 | Marilyn R Dausel | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $26,007 |
27 | Ro Don Cattle Co | Holstein, IA 51025 | $25,665 |
28 | Nielsen Buffalo LLC | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $24,437 |
29 | Nancy Feddersen-roger And Nancy Feddersen Revocabl | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $24,398 |
30 | Daryl Kruse | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $23,445 |
31 | Carl S Lee | Grimes, IA 50111 | $23,306 |
32 | Anna Mae Warnier | Red Oak, IA 51566 | $23,205 |
33 | Janet Rehse | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $22,622 |
34 | Richard R Degen | Holstein, IA 51025 | $22,373 |
35 | Preston Youngren | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $21,471 |
36 | Richard E Smith | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $21,405 |
37 | Bonnie L Boyle | Danbury, IA 51019 | $20,500 |
38 | Dennis Collins | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $20,219 |
39 | Dean Danilson | North Sioux City, SD 57049 | $18,875 |
40 | Loraine F Vohs Revocable Living Trust | Holstein, IA 51025 | $18,862 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”